Dr. Akitomo Yamamoto (currently Project Researcher at Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo), Dr. Michio Kawamiya (Director) at Research Center for Environmental Modeling and Application, JAMSTEC), and their colleagues report that nutrient inputs, such as nitrogen and iron, to the ocean from human activities affects the global oceanic primary production (※1), carbon uptake, and deoxygenation (※2). The magnitude of these effects is comparable to those of climate change. These findings were based on historical simulations from an Earth system model (※3) which contributed to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC AR6 ※4).
Because of human activities, such as fossil fuel combustion, land-use change, and fertilizer application, current fluxes of nitrogen and iron from atmosphere and rivers to the ocean are estimated to be more than double than those during preindustrial levels. Although global ocean biogeochemistry is known to be affected by human activities, previous related studies focused primarily on the changes induced by climate change (Fig. 1). However, the global impact of anthropogenic nutrient inputs on ocean biogeochemical cycles has not been fully understood. In this study, using an Earth System model, historical simulations for the period 1850–2014 and sensitivity simulations were conducted to evaluate the effects of nutrient inputs and climate change on ocean biogeochemical cycles, respectively, and the relationship between nutrient inputs and climate change was assessed.
The results showed that anthropogenic nutrient inputs to the ocean enhance oceanic primary production and carbon uptake mainly in the coastal regions, but also significantly on a global scale. These global increases by anthropogenic nutrient inputs offset most of global reductions in primary production and carbon uptake induced by climate change (Fig. 2). Furthermore, anthropogenic nutrient inputs significantly accelerate climate-driven deoxygenation in the upper ocean (Fig. 3). These results suggested that human activities cause global changes in the ocean biogeochemical cycles through both anthropogenic nutrient inputs and climate change (Fig. 1).
Because atmospheric and riverine nutrient inputs increase or remain relatively constant during the remainder of 21st century, the effect of anthropogenic nutrient inputs on ocean biogeochemistry could continue. To properly assess future and past changes of ocean biogeochemistry attributable to human activities, it is necessary to consider not only the effect of climate change but also the effect of anthropogenic nutrient inputs.
This paper has been published in Science Advances on July 2, 2022. The research was partially supported by the national research fund of JSPS Kakenhi (grant number: JP20K12144) and the Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU) (grant number: JPMXD0717935715) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan.
Figure 1: Schematic of the oceanic biogeochemical changes associated with climate change (black lines) and anthropogenic nutrient inputs to the ocean (red lines).
Figure 2: Changes in primary production. (a) Time series of changes in the globally integrated primary production for climate (black line), anthropogenic nutrient (green line), and all effects (red line). Historical trends in CMIP5 and CMIP6 (※5) models are shown as blue and orange squares, respectively. (b) Distribution of changes in primary production caused by climate effect. The values show changes from preindustrial level to the last 10 years (2005–2014). (c) Distribution of changes in primary production caused by anthropogenic nutrient effect. (d) Comparison between climate and anthropogenic nutrient effects on primary production changes for each basin. Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans are also divided into northern (red: 15°–60°N), low-latitude (black: 15°S–15°N), and southern (blue: 5°–50°S) regions. Green and red background indicate that the effect of anthropogenic nutrients and climate is the dominant factor in net primary production changes, respectively.
Figure 3: Changes in Dissolved oxygen. (a) Time series of changes in dissolved oxygen concentration in the upper 1000 m caused by climate (black line), anthropogenic nutrients (green line), and all effects (red line). Values are anomalies relative to 1970. Observed change from 1970 to 2010 is shown as black square. Historical trends in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models are shown as blue and orange squares, respectively. (b) Distribution of oxygen changes caused by climate effect. The values indicate change from 1970 to 2010. (c) Distribution of oxygen changes caused by anthropogenic nutrient effect.